Documentation that points where the documentation is

The working notes, the roadmap and the eight topic notes now live on the wiki,
so the twelve places in the source that said "see CLAUDE.md" were pointing at
a file this repository no longer has. They say "see the working notes" now,
and the README opens onto the wiki rather than onto two files beside it.

Four references are deliberately untouched -- prompts.py, settings_store.py,
admin/agents.html and the whole of agent/instructions.py. Those name AGENTS.md
and CLAUDE.md as the file an agent chat looks for in *somebody else's* project
directory. Rewriting them would have broken the feature while looking tidy.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>

src/lembas/services/agent/index.py

@@ -18,7 +18,7 @@ a model choosing to run something. Both are read-only, both are built here
 rather than assembled from anything a model said, and the project directory is
 configuration rather than input. It is still an exception to Manual mode's
 "everything is shown to you before it happens", and it is written down in
-CLAUDE.md next to the others.
+the working notes, next to the others.
 
 **Nothing here is trusted.** Filenames come off somebody else's machine and end
 up inside a system prompt, so they are stripped of control characters, capped

src/lembas/services/agent/jobs.py

@@ -184,7 +184,7 @@ def launch_and_wait_command(chat_id: str, job_id: str, command: str, max_bytes:
         # operand and formats to "<Logger … (WARNING)>", whose angle brackets and
         # parentheses are shell syntax -- so this line died with a syntax error,
         # after the sentinel where nothing reads it, and every job's four files
-        # were left on the far side forever. See the note in CLAUDE.md.
+        # were left on the far side forever. See the note in the working notes.
         f"rm -f {_file(chat_id, job_id, 'sh')} {pid} {logf} {exit_}\n"
     )
 

src/lembas/services/branding.py

@@ -7,7 +7,7 @@ are separate because they fail differently:
   shows;
 - **flavour text** — the Middle-earth lines, which live in the artwork, the
   empty states, the loading lines and the error pages and nowhere else (see the
-  flavour rule in CLAUDE.md), and which somebody rebranding needs to be able to
+  flavour rule in the working notes), and which somebody rebranding needs to be able to
   replace without editing templates;
 - **themes**, which are token sets rather than stylesheets, because the
   invariant that no component hard-codes a colour is what makes a third one
@@ -36,7 +36,7 @@ page and by nothing else.
 The cost of being a cache is stated rather than discovered: with several
 workers, a save in one is not seen by the others until each next reads. That is
 already true of this application for other reasons -- see the "one worker" note
-in PLAN.md -- and this does not make it worse.
+in the roadmap -- and this does not make it worse.
 """
 
 from __future__ import annotations

src/lembas/services/tools.py

@@ -383,7 +383,7 @@ async def _run_fetch(context: ToolContext, args: dict[str, Any]) -> ToolOutcome:
 
     Straight through `services/fetch.py`, which owns the SSRF guard, the
     hand-rolled redirect loop that re-checks every hop, and the content-type
-    sniff. Deliberately not a second HTTP client: CLAUDE.md already names three
+    sniff. Deliberately not a second HTTP client: the working notes already name three
     places that follow redirects by hand as the ceiling, and a fourth is how one
     of them loses its check.
     """