Correcting a command before allowing it

An approval card was Allow, Always, or Don't. A model proposing the right
command with one flag wrong therefore cost a whole round trip to explain in
prose. There is an Edit button on it now.

Where the edit lands is the whole of the feature, and it is one line.
`arguments` is the list `_run_calls` hands to `run_tool` as `parsed=`, and
`run_tool` never re-parses -- so writing into it inside `_authorise` is the
only mutation the runner can see. Editing the Item would do nothing: it is
frozen and display-only.

Two things had to move with it. The raw `call["arguments"]` string is rewritten
beside the parsed dict, and the assistant turn is now built *after* `_authorise`
rather than before it -- the old order told the model it ran what it proposed
while something else ran, and every later round would have reasoned from a
transcript that was quietly false. And `_remember_always` reads the edit, or
"always allow this" would store a standing permission for a command nobody
approved; it still derives the pattern itself through `policy.subject`, which
yields nothing for a composed command line.

Nothing is re-checked against the mode or the lists, and that is not a shortcut.
The deny list resolves to ASK rather than to a refusal -- it means "always ask
about this" -- so a person who has typed the command and pressed Allow is
exactly the asking it was demanding, and re-asking would put the same card up
with no way past it. It is the line the terminal panel already draws.

The box is only offered where the detail *is* an argument and can be put back:
a tool with no entry in `tool_labels.DETAIL_KEYS` gets a `k=repr(v)` summary,
and a box there would silently change nothing. Both halves are always in the
DOM with one hidden, rather than the field being created on click -- a field
that does not exist until a handler runs is a field that submits nothing if
the handler fails, and this one decides what runs on somebody's machine.

The transcript says "edited by you". Attributing somebody's own typing to a
model is the same misattribution as the other way round.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>

src/lembas/web/templates/chat/_interaction.html

@@ -68,7 +68,7 @@
 
     {% else %}
       {% for item in ask.items %}
-      <div class="interaction__question">
+      <div class="interaction__question" x-data="{ editing: false }">
         <p class="interaction__title">{{ item.title }}</p>
         {% if item.purpose %}
         {# The model's own account of what this is for, above the thing itself.
@@ -78,7 +78,44 @@
         <p class="interaction__purpose">It says: {{ item.purpose }}</p>
         {% endif %}
         {% if item.detail %}
-        <pre class="interaction__detail">{{ item.detail }}</pre>
+          {% if item.editable %}
+          {#
+            The command, correctable before it runs. A model proposing the right
+            thing with one flag wrong is the common case, and Allow-or-Don't
+            makes that a round trip to explain in prose.
+
+            Both halves are always in the DOM and one is hidden, rather than the
+            box being created when Edit is pressed: a field that does not exist
+            until a click is a field that submits nothing if the click handler
+            ever fails, and this one decides what runs on somebody's machine.
+            The textarea is disabled while hidden so an untouched card cannot
+            post a `text.` field at all — that field means "this was edited",
+            and an empty one arriving would be indistinguishable from a command
+            somebody cleared.
+          #}
+          <div x-show="!editing">
+            <pre class="interaction__detail">{{ item.detail }}</pre>
+            <button class="btn btn--sm" type="button"
+                    @click="editing = true; $nextTick(() => $refs.edit{{ item.key }}.focus())">
+              {{ icon("pencil", "icon--sm") }} Edit
+            </button>
+          </div>
+          <div x-show="editing" x-cloak>
+            <label class="visually-hidden" for="edit-{{ item.key }}">
+              Change this before it runs
+            </label>
+            <textarea class="textarea interaction__edit" id="edit-{{ item.key }}"
+                      name="text.{{ item.key }}" rows="3" spellcheck="false"
+                      x-ref="edit{{ item.key }}"
+                      :disabled="!editing">{{ item.detail }}</textarea>
+            <p class="interaction__reason">
+              Allow runs what is in the box. It is not checked against this
+              chat's rules again — you typed it.
+            </p>
+          </div>
+          {% else %}
+          <pre class="interaction__detail">{{ item.detail }}</pre>
+          {% endif %}
         {% endif %}
         {% if item.reason %}
         <p class="interaction__reason">{{ item.reason }}</p>