Models that know about each other, and have a self

Three features sharing one idea: a model here started from nothing every
conversation and had no notion that anything else existed.

THE ROSTER. `chat.roster_block` builds one line per model this *person* can
reach -- through `permissions.models_visible_to`, never the table -- and
`{{model_roster}}` carries it, gated on the `friend` family for the reason the
memories block is gated on `memory`: a list of peers a model cannot talk to is
context spent on nothing, and one checkbox is then the whole switch. New
`Model.notes` column, a column and not a `capabilities_json` key for the reason
`context_length` and `reasoning_efforts` both carry.

ASKING A FRIEND. A second entry point in `services/subagent.py` rather than a
second module, so one place still owns the bounds and the lifecycle. `_create_
child` takes the friend's (model_id, connection_id) *pair*, because Model is
unique on both and an id alone does not say which endpoint. Three things differ
from a helper: the effort is the friend's own default and never the parent's (the
1.3.0 bug by another door -- the vocabularies differ and a level a model does not
take raises inside its chat template), the chat is ordinary even when the asker's
is an agent chat, and `scope_json["role"]` marks it so `core.friend` speaks
instead of `core.subagent`. `friend` joins the unattended withdrawal set: a
friend that could ask a friend is the same unbounded fan-out in politer clothes.
Budget, concurrency and quota are shared with helpers, so one reply cannot spend
the allowance twice.

PERSONALITY. One table, two roles, `owner_id IS NULL` the discriminator: the
model's own persona, and its read of one person. Keyed on the model's *text* id
with no foreign key, because "Test & refresh" deletes a model the endpoint has
stopped listing and a personality must not be collateral. `PersonaRevision`
copies SkillRevision, and so does the argument: the safety story for a model
rewriting itself is a record and a way back, not a gate. The reflection is shown
to the person it is about, in their own settings, which is the whole of why
keeping one is acceptable. `persona` is withdrawn from any unattended chat --
a helper's task, a friend's question and a schedule's instruction are all words
nobody watched being written.

Two bugs found while reading for this, both silent:

`review_model_id` stored a `Model` primary key, so a refresh taken while an
endpoint was not listing that model unset the administrator's choice -- and
`_reviewer` then fell back to the chat's own model, so pictures were judged by
a model nobody chose. Now the text id, with the primary key still accepted.

`_messages_after` used a bare `>` on `created_at`, so a row sharing the edited
turn's microsecond survived a rewind -- and `_send` writes a user turn and its
placeholder back to back, which is exactly that tie. Deliberately NOT
`thread_tail`'s `(created_at, id)` tiebreak: ids are random UUIDs, so that
settles a tie by coin toss. A tie now reads as "later", which is the safe
direction for an operation whose purpose is to discard what follows.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>

src/lembas/web/templates/settings.html

@@ -420,6 +420,45 @@
                 message.
               </p>
             </div>
+
+            {# What each model has made of you, in its own words. Shown whether or
+               not any model is still allowed to write one: a model whose
+               permission was taken away has not forgotten, and this is the only
+               place the text can be read or removed. #}
+            {% if reflections %}
+            <div class="card">
+              <h2 class="card__title">
+                What models make of you
+                <span class="badge">{{ reflections|length }}</span>
+              </h2>
+              <p class="card__lede">
+                Each model's own impression of how you work, kept by that model and
+                read back to it in every conversation. Opinions rather than facts,
+                and each one is that model's alone — the others cannot see it, and
+                neither can anybody else. Delete any of them; it will form another
+                if it has reason to.
+              </p>
+              <ul class="model-list">
+                {% for reflection in reflections %}
+                <li class="model-list__item">
+                  <div style="min-width: 0">
+                    <strong>{{ reflection.model_key }}</strong>
+                    <div class="text-sm">{{ reflection.content }}</div>
+                  </div>
+                  <form method="post"
+                        action="/api/library/reflections/{{ reflection.id }}/delete">
+                    <button class="btn btn--sm btn--danger" type="submit"
+                            data-confirm-button="Delete what this model makes of you?"
+                            data-confirm-title="Delete"
+                            aria-label="Delete this" title="Delete this">
+                      {{ icon("trash", "icon--sm") }}
+                    </button>
+                  </form>
+                </li>
+                {% endfor %}
+              </ul>
+            </div>
+            {% endif %}
           </section>
           {% endif %}