LLeMbas/docs/notes/audit-0.9.md

The 0.9 audit

A working document, written during the pass over everything that landed between 0.8.1 and 0.9.8 -- 16 commits, 163 files, +16,795 / −1,608. It exists so the findings survive the session that produced them, and so the security and testing stages have something to work from rather than re-deriving it.

This file is temporary. Everything in it either becomes a CHANGELOG.md line, a paragraph in CLAUDE.md, or an entry under "After 1.0.0" in PLAN.md. It is deleted before the release.

Each finding carries a disposition:

• fixed -- landed, with a test
• later -- real, but the fix changes what a feature does, so it is the user's call and it is written up rather than done
• stated -- correct as it stands, and recorded so the next audit does not spend an hour rediscovering that it is deliberate

---

The harness and the instruction prompts

{{timezone}} shipped as a hole — fixed

clock.name_for returns "" for anybody who has never chosen a zone, which is the default state of every account. substitute drops a line only when the whole line is blank after expansion, and this variable sits inside a sentence, so every such request carried:

- Times the person gives you are in  unless they say otherwise.

Both the comment at harness.py:191 and the fragment's own hint asserted the line disappeared. Neither had ever been true. The sibling call site (schedule/compile.py:102) has always had the fallback.

Worth noting why the fallback is right rather than merely convenient: stamp is clock.now_for(user), which already falls back to the server's zone, and {{now}} already prints its offset. The times were already in that zone. Withholding the label from a value the model had been given was not restraint.

The admin preview could not show most of what it previews — fixed

admin_prompts.py built its variables with context_variables(db, user, [], None) — no tools, no chat — and backfilled six names. Every other requires gate stayed empty, so eleven fragments could never appear in a preview whatever an administrator ticked: the whole agent surface, both scheduling fragments and the helper warning. Editing tool.agent and pressing preview showed a system message with tool.agent missing from it, silently.

Fixed with sample values, which is what SAMPLE_DOCUMENTS already did for attachments, plus two controls the "Tools offered" row could not reach — "This chat is" (ordinary / scheduled task / helper) and an agent-mode select. The samples are gated exactly as context_variables gates the real values, because a preview that admits a fragment the real request would not is worse than one that omits it.

Fragments named tools that had been withdrawn — fixed for Plan mode, later for the rest

resolve_tools filters per tool; harness._families re-derives gates per family. So a family survives on its readers while its writers are gone, and the family-gated fragment still names them — under core.tool_list saying "Anything not named there does not exist here — calling it costs a round and returns nothing."

Fixed: Plan mode. agent/tools.py:1185 withdraws plan_update there, and tool.plan_update was gated on {{plan}}, which is set whenever a plan exists in any mode. A new plan_editable variable — the plan text, blank in Plan mode — now gates it. Writing the test found a second instance the audit had missed: context.plan also said "Change it with plan_update", so that sentence moved to the fragment whose job it is.

Later: a read-only helper keeps seven fragments naming fifteen withdrawn write tools (notes_create, report_write, file_write, skill_create, the three schedule writers…). The principled fix is the split tool.skills / tool.skills_write already demonstrates, applied to notes, report, schedule and agent_edits — four more fragment pairs. That is a prompt restructure rather than a bug fix and it is proposed for after 1.0.0. The cost today is bounded: {{tool_names}} is authoritative and the model has it, so a helper wastes at most one round discovering a writer is absent.

Three tool descriptions disagreed with their runners — all fixed

• subagent_run opened "a second model with the same tools" and contradicted itself two sentences later. The child is forced to ask:False, subagent:False, write:False with commands pinned to SAFE_COMMANDS. The leading clause is what a model reads when sizing a task.
• knowledge_get returned extracted_text whole while every sibling reader capped and said so — fetch at 20k, file_read, the memories block, the skill index, the project listing. MAX_EXTRACTED_CHARS defaults to 120,000, so one call on a long PDF filled an ordinary window with nothing reporting it. Its description said "in full", which is why this read as correct: the tool did exactly what it claimed. Now MAX_DOCUMENT_CHARS = 40_000, cut with the model told, which is what fetch and file_read both do.
• _run_ask_user read args["question"], singular, against a schema declaring questions and a list — so its event always carried an empty query. Harmless only because the path is documented unreachable, which is exactly why nothing caught it.

Fragment text that was false — fixed

tool.subagent_agent said a helper "reads and reports … and nothing else, in every mode" beside a write parameter that makes one write files, and named seven of the twenty-three commands in SAFE_COMMANDS — so a model avoided commands it was allowed, which costs nothing visible and is therefore never reported. Both halves are now pinned by tests against the real list and the real schema, because prose and a constant drift the moment one is edited alone.

The distinction the wording now has to carry, and did not before: commands are fixed to the read-only list in every mode, since an unattended chat cannot approve anything; files may be written, but only by a helper asked for with write and only from Edit or Auto.

tool.background promises a notification that can be off — later

"When a background job finishes you are told in a new turn" has no requires for agents.background_notify, and the runner itself branches on that flag and says "Check on it with job_output" instead. One fragment, two behaviours. The fix is a variable and a gate, the same shape as plan_editable; deferred only because it wants the split above rather than a third one-off.

FAMILY_ASK has no fragment at all — later

Every other family in FAMILIES contributes one. ask_user is offered in nearly every chat and all of its guidance lives in its schema description, which is the one thing an administrator cannot edit. Proposed rather than done: it is new prompt text, and new prompt text in an audit stage is how an audit turns into a feature.

Smaller, all stated

• model_name is resolved on every request and rendered by no shipped fragment. It is documented in VARIABLES and available to an administrator's override, so it is an escape hatch rather than dead work. The cost is one small select on a table with tens of rows.
• Four pairs of fragments share an order, which undercuts "sparse so a custom tool can be slotted between two of these". Ties break alphabetically and deterministically. One has a readable consequence: context.schedule sorts below context.memories, so a scheduled task's own instruction appears under the reader's remembered facts.
• core.rounds is dark on a stock install, since DEFAULT_CHAT_ROUNDS = 0. Deliberate — core.keep_working is its complement and exactly one ever fires.
• A row-backed fragment with empty guidance can never be selected, so for those "never configured" and "deliberately switched off" are the same state — the one distinction the absent-vs-empty convention exists to preserve.

---

Controls

The four sweeps CLAUDE.md is shaped around were run by hand over every template and all four came back clean: 68 htmx verbs against 179 registered routes with zero method mismatches, 88 plain form actions and 30 fetch/htmx.ajax call sites with zero, every verb-carrying element declaring its own hx-target or hx-swap="none" checked against every ancestor, no empty verb attributes, both form="…" sites correct, and every hx-target, hx-include and from: selector resolving to an id that exists.

Making each one a test that sweeps is Stage 2's work. A one-off audit that finds nothing is worth much less than the same audit made permanent.

Capabilities that are built, documented and unreachable — Stage 2

The Model.params_json and library.share family: the code is right, the route validates, and nothing can reach it.

• Folder nesting. PATCH /api/folders/{id} handles parent_id with a cycle guard and MAX_DEPTH = 8, partials/_folder.html recurses, and README.md advertises "arbitrarily nested". No template or script submits parent_id.
• Moving a chat into a folder. api/chats.py handles folder_id on PATCH; only the composer submits it, at creation. chat/_composer.html even carries a comment reasoning about "the only way into a folder was to make the chat elsewhere and move it".
• Connection.extra_headers_json is read into every LLM request and written by no form, so its documented use — OpenRouter's HTTP-Referer — is unreachable. later: nothing advertises it, so nothing is currently untrue.

Written and never read: Chat.compacted_at, User.last_login_at, Schedule.last_fire_at, Schedule.compiled_at. Neither read nor written: general.require_approval (its comment says "reserved"), and the back form parameter on two admin_models routes.

Stated: Message.parent_id and content_parts_json are deliberate forward -looking columns; Chat.archived is already recorded in PLAN.md as a column nothing surfaces.

Documentation — Stage 2

• README.md is stale by six phases. "Planned: Image generation · OCR · semantic search" — two of the three shipped. Nothing under Features mentions schedules, reports, subagents, branding, quotas, web push, updates, Docker or LXC.
• CLAUDE.md says "Three topics live in docs/notes/" and lists seven.
• CLAUDE.md says 2088 tests; there are 2092 before this stage.
• tests/__pycache__/test_zz_{dump,live}*.pyc are stale bytecode for two files that no longer exist.

For the security stage

Carried forward rather than answered here:

• the three hand-rolled redirect loops each re-run check_url per hop (confirmed); does each also drop the secret when a hop leaves its origin?
• admin_tools.py calls check_url(server.url, allow_private=True) unconditionally at save — a syntax check, with the per-row flag governing at call time. Confirm that reading is right.
• the subagent restriction is the one gate that fails open unattended. _child_scope forcing ask:False, subagent:False, write:False and pinning allow to SAFE_COMMANDS is confirmed present; the question is whether every path reaches it.
• pyproject.toml pins no upper bounds and deploy/update.sh runs pip install -e on every update, so a breaking upstream release arrives on a button press. pip's only-if-needed default limits the blast radius, which is why this is a note rather than an emergency.

For the testing stage

• api/library.py: 28 routes, effectively zero HTTP coverage. Highest exposure — auth, ownership and permission gates all live at that boundary.
• No real sync_schema upgrade test exists. conftest.py runs create_all then sync_schema, so the differ is only ever exercised as a no-op. Hard rule 4 has no other safety net.
• cli.py: zero tests, and create-admin is the documented bootstrap.
• SSE has three end-to-end tests; services/sse.py has none.
• composer.js, terminal.js and audio.js — 1,188 lines — have no assertion of any kind.
• The suite has only ever run on Python 3.14. The Dockerfile ships 3.12 and requires-python claims 3.11.