b8618b0c91
Tokens, how full the context is, and tokens per second -- as chips under each assistant bubble, updating while the reply streams and still there when it finishes. The numbers come from one Metrics object built either from the generation still being written or from the row it left behind. That is the point rather than tidiness: the finished bubble is re-rendered from the database the instant the stream ends, so two code paths would make the figures visibly jump at exactly the moment someone is watching them. Here the only thing that changes is that an estimate may become exact. Message.usage_json has existed and been dead since the schema was written. It is the store. Two counts that look like one. prompt and completion are summed across tool rounds -- what the reply cost. context_tokens is overwritten each round with that round's prompt plus completion -- what the window actually holds. A three-round reply pays for its prompt three times and only ever occupies the window once, so a single number would be wrong for one of the two questions. Generation gains started_at as a field rather than a local in _run, because _follow is a different function that sees only the Generation and otherwise has nothing to compute a live speed against. It also carries a prompt estimate taken before the first chunk, since real usage arrives in one chunk at the very end and a percentage that appears only after the reply is useless. Everything is marked with a tilde when the endpoint reported nothing, and the percentage is simply absent when no context length is set: unknown has to stay tellable from small, and a percentage of an unknown total is a made-up number in a place people trust numbers. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>