Files
LLeMbas/PLAN.md
T
Jaroslav Beneš de178837b8 Background generation, unread replies, send/stop, PLAN.md
**Replies now run in the background.** Generation was driven by the SSE
request, so navigating away or opening another chat cut the answer off
mid-sentence. services/generation.py owns the work as its own task and
the SSE endpoint merely follows it. Verified: attached briefly, closed
the connection, went to another page -- the reply finished anyway, 832
characters, not marked stopped, auto-titled.

Reattaching works because both `render` and `reasoning` frames now carry
the whole block rather than a delta. A follower arriving late has no
earlier fragments to append to, so deltas would leave it permanently
missing the beginning. Verified: attached six seconds in and the first
frame already contained 517 characters written while nobody watched.

**Unread indicator.** A reply that lands with no follower attached marks
its chat unread; the sidebar polls every 10s for out-of-band dot spans
plus an HX-Trigger that raises a toast. Polled rather than pushed: a
browser sitting on another chat has no connection to the one that
finished, and an always-on channel per tab is a lot of machinery for a
green dot. `unread_notified` stops the same arrival being announced
every tick. Follower count is what decides "was anyone watching", so
reading it as it arrives does not mark it unread -- verified both ways.

**Stop is the send button.** While a reply is being written the send
button becomes a red stop square, found via a MutationObserver on the
thread since the composer and the streaming bubble are far apart in the
document. The in-bubble Stop is gone.

**Attachment border removed.** As asked -- an attachment is a picture,
and the frame only ever drew at the wrong width. The anchor now
shrink-wraps and the img's width/height attributes are overridden so a
small image shows at its own size.

Adds PLAN.md: what is built, what is not, known limits, and the
decisions that look like oversights until you know the reason.

239 tests, ruff clean.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-07-21 14:52:28 +02:00

7.2 KiB

LLeMbas — plan and status

Where the project is, what is deliberately not built yet, and the decisions that would be expensive to revisit. Kept current as work lands; the detail of how things work lives in CLAUDE.md.

Status: usable daily. Streaming chat, attachments, reasoning, users and groups, model administration. 230 tests, ruff clean.


The shape of it

A self-hosted web UI for OpenAI-compatible endpoints, written in Python, themed after Middle-earth.

Stack FastAPI + Jinja + htmx + a little Alpine
Build step none — no Node, no npm, no CDN at runtime
Database SQLite, schema synchronised additively at startup
Deployment systemd unit + nginx vhost, one worker

These are load-bearing. Dropping the no-build rule or moving off SQLite would be a different project, not a refactor.


Done

Chat

  • Streaming replies over server-sent events
  • Markdown renders progressively — re-rendered whole every 100ms rather than appending tokens, because a list or code fence is only correct once its context exists
  • Syntax highlighting (Pygments), sanitised with nh3
  • Generation runs in the background — a task, not the request. Navigate away, open another chat, close the tab: the reply keeps being written and reattaching replays the whole state
  • Stop — the send button becomes Stop while writing; what arrived is kept
  • Rewind — edit one of your own turns and the conversation runs on from there. Truncates rather than branching
  • Copy, regenerate, automatic chat titles
  • Chats created on first message, so an abandoned composer leaves nothing
  • Unread indicator — a green dot and a toast when a reply lands while you were elsewhere
  • Folders, arbitrarily nested; deleting one keeps the chats inside it

Models and reasoning

  • OpenAI-compatible connections with encrypted keys and model discovery
  • Reasoning displayreasoning_content and inline <think> tags, collapsed by default, labelled with how long it took, never replayed as context
  • Model admin as a list plus a page per model; scales to hundreds
  • Ordering, pinning (a sidebar shortcut, not a reordering), instance default, per-user default, images, capability flags
  • Custom model picker showing avatars, descriptions and capabilities

Attachments

  • Drag, paste or pick images, PDFs and text files
  • Images downscaled and sent to vision models as content parts
  • PDF and text extracted at upload and placed in the prompt
  • Type decided by inspecting bytes, random names on disk, non-images served as downloads with nosniff
  • No OCR: a scanned PDF says so rather than silently contributing nothing

People

  • Accounts, argon2, revocable server-side sessions, self-service password change
  • Users and groups with permissions that union rather than override
  • Model access restricted to chosen groups
  • Registration toggle, instance settings stored in the database

Prompts

  • Three layers — instance, model, chat — with the most specific winning outright rather than being concatenated

Interface

  • Two themes (moria, shire) from one set of design tokens
  • Every control sized from --control-h, so rows line up by construction
  • Toasts and dialogs of our own; no window.confirm anywhere
  • Original SVG artwork generated from a single source

Operations

  • Additive schema sync — new tables and columns applied at startup
  • deploy/ — systemd unit and nginx templates, install and update scripts

Not built yet

In the order they are likely to be worth doing.

Tools — built-in, with admin settings

A tool registry, per-tool settings in the admin area, and tool-calling wired through the chat loop. Model.capabilities_json already carries a tools flag that nothing reads. The chat loop currently assumes one request produces one reply; tool calling makes it a loop, which is the real work.

Custom tools and MCP servers

An MCP client managing configured servers, their tools surfaced alongside the built-in ones. Depends on the tool loop above.

Agentic execution

Two modes, as originally specified:

  • local — subprocess on the machine LLeMbas runs on
  • remote — SSH connection profiles, with shell.run / fs.read / fs.write

Needs a confirmation model before it does anything. Note that the systemd unit is deliberately only ProtectSystem=full rather than strict because of this — revisit the hardening when the real filesystem needs are known.

Image generation

Left until last from the start, as it needs heavy customisation. ComfyUI is already running on this machine and is the obvious first target.

Smaller things

  • OCR for scanned PDFs
  • Conversation branchingMessage.parent_id exists unused; needs a UI for choosing between versions, which is why rewind truncates for now
  • Web search as a built-in tool
  • Chat export (Markdown, JSON)
  • Archived chats — the column exists, nothing surfaces it
  • Per-user quotas

Known limits

Worth knowing before they surprise someone.

One worker. The generation registry and the stop mechanism are in-process. Running several workers needs that state in the database or a broker, because the request following a reply would not necessarily land in the process writing it.

A restart abandons replies in flight. Shutdown cancels them and keeps what each had. There is no resume.

Schema changes are additive only. New tables and columns apply themselves; renames, drops and retypes are manual against the SQLite file. MANUAL_STEPS in db/migrations.py is where such a step gets recorded.

Attachments live on disk, unreferenced files are swept at startup. No deduplication, no size quota.

Unread is polled every 10 seconds. A push channel would be more responsive but means an always-on connection per tab for the sake of a green dot.


Deliberate decisions

Recorded because each looks like an oversight until you know the reason.

  • No JavaScript build step. Browser libraries are hash-pinned and committed. A self-hosted tool should work offline and not report page views to a CDN.
  • Permissions union, never deny. With denies, "why can this user not do X" cannot be answered without simulating every group.
  • System prompts replace, never stack. Two layers that disagree give the model contradictory instructions and nobody can tell which is losing.
  • Rewind truncates, does not branch. Branching needs a UI for choosing between versions; "go back and try again from here" is what was asked for.
  • Pinning is a shortcut, not an ordering. A picker whose order silently differs from the admin screen is confusing.
  • Images only reach models marked vision. Not graceful degradation: most endpoints reject the entire request rather than ignoring an image part.
  • Markdown rendered server-side. One code path produces the streamed and the stored view, so they cannot disagree.
  • This repository is public. Deployment hostnames, ports and paths stay out of it; deploy/ is templates, and the real values live in private notes.