3afbccba81cbc89ca29d32fbab16e6da3f6d732a
9 Commits
| Author | SHA1 | Message | Date | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
3afbccba81
|
A time in no particular zone, and a preview missing what it previews
The first audit pass: everything from 0.8.1 to 0.9.8 read as a whole rather than one feature at a time, starting with what a model is actually told. Four of these had shipped as correct. The date line carried a timezone variable that resolves to nothing until somebody chooses one -- so every default account was told times were "in unless they say otherwise", while two comments asserted the line disappeared instead. The prompt preview built its variables without a chat, which is what eleven fragments are gated on, so the whole agent surface was absent from it whatever was ticked. Plan mode was instructed to keep its plan current with a tool that mode withdraws. And knowledge_get returned a document whole where every sibling reader caps and says so, its description promising exactly that. The subagent guidance was wrong in both directions at once: it denied a documented parameter and named seven of twenty-three allowed commands. Both halves are pinned by tests against the real list and the real schema now, because prose and a constant drift the moment one is edited alone. docs/notes/audit-0.9.md carries the findings that are not fixed here, with why -- the ones whose fix would change what a feature does are the user's call, not this pass's. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> |
||
|
|
9d7fb72bdb |
Grants that outlive what they name, and a rule you can read
sharing.forget_principal has existed since shares did, documented as the thing that stops a recycled id inheriting somebody's grant, and was called by nobody. Deleting a group left every grant naming it; deleting an account left both the grants to it and the grants of its own work -- that second half is the one nothing else could catch, since their rows cascade and the shares of those rows have nothing to cascade from. Both now run before the delete, while the rows are still findable, and a deleted resource forgets its own. library.share defaulted to False, which meant sharing shipped documented as done and unreachable: the panel only renders for somebody holding it, so out of the box nobody could share anything and nothing said why. It is on. The panel itself was checkboxes inside the resource's *save form*, listing every group and every account on the instance, unpaginated, on every detail page -- and a tick only took effect if you also saved the resource. It is its own routes now: search, one grant per POST, the panel re-rendered from what is stored. Anything already shared stays listed whatever the search says, or removing a grant would mean searching for the name it was given to. Reports join the shareable set and memories still do not: a finished piece of work is the thing somebody most wants to hand over, and a record about a person is not content to pass round. reports.visible became sharing.visible_to, which is the one line its own docstring predicted. Two things fell out: `owned` beside `get`, because sharing grants reading and deleting is the owner's alone; and reading somebody else's report no longer clears their unread dot. Permissions gained the answer to "what can this person actually do?" -- explain() is resolve()'s working shown rather than thrown away, naming admin, the baseline, or the groups that granted each one. That is the simulation the union rule exists to make unnecessary, and until now the only way to get it was to open every group and read the grids by eye. Users and groups are list-plus-detail, and membership is edited from one side: it was on both, and a full-form POST from either overwrote what the other had shown. Read and write are split for notes, memory and skills -- checked on the tool's declared risk, after the gate so it can only narrow, and defaulting on. Quotas are the union rule applied to numbers, with the corner that makes it interesting: zero means "no limit" and wins outright, or a group saying unlimited would count for less than one saying a million. Absent means "no opinion". _narrower folds a group's ceiling with the instance's and is deliberately not min, for the same reason. Five axes, enforced where each is knowable -- before a reply is built, before a second one starts, on an agent reply's clock, before a minute of GPU, and beside the helper cap -- and usage is recorded even for a reply that was stopped or errored, because an endpoint charges either way. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> |
||
|
|
757ab305ee |
Finding a thing that does not use your words
Three pieces, and the first one is that they are all optional. Extraction stops being constants. Upload size, image edge, JPEG quality, PDF pages, extracted characters, orphan age and the text-extension list are settings now, read through a process-level snapshot rather than a session -- `prepare` and everything under it are called from routes, tool runners and the startup sweep, and several of those have no session in hand. Two things deliberately stayed constants: the decompression-bomb guard, which is a guard and not a preference, and ORPHAN_AGE, which would have been evaluated at import if it stayed in the signature and pinned the shipped 24 hours whatever anybody set. An embedding model is picked from the models an administrator flagged for it, and one that has since lost its flag is *named* rather than dropped from the picker: a setting that vanishes is one nobody can tell from a setting never made. Nothing here is required. Choosing none means no chunk rows, no requests, and retrieval.search returning exactly what fts.search_ids returns in exactly that order -- asserted, because it is what makes this safe to land on an instance that never asked for it. The two rankings are fused by reciprocal rank fusion: ranks and not scores, because bm25 is a corpus-dependent negative and cosine is 0..1, and normalising them onto one scale means picking a constant nobody can tune without a labelled set they do not have. RRF's one constant is famously insensitive and degrades to whichever list is non-empty -- which is what turns "no embedding model" into a branch that does not exist. A record scores as its best chunk rather than its average, or a long document about something else outranks a short one that says the thing. Width and model are stored beside every vector and a mismatch is skipped, because vectors from two spaces score against each other perfectly happily and mean nothing -- a search that works and is wrong is the worst failure this can have, and a model change now leaves stale rows ignored rather than trusted. Indexing is fired and forgotten, and how a change is noticed is a session event rather than a call in each of the ten library writers. That is a departure from this codebase's taste for explicit seams, for the reason tool_label is a Jinja global: a step every writer has to remember is one that gets forgotten, and here forgetting is silent -- the record saves, keyword search still finds it, and only its recall goes stale. Chunks are embedded before anything is deleted, so a failure leaves the old index rather than half a new one. Also: `embeddings` joins the model capabilities, and the three tool flags that had shipped with no checkbox -- canvas, scheduling and helpers -- have one. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> |
||
|
|
b8e7745311 |
An instance that can be somebody else's
A name, a tagline, a logo, a favicon and the launcher icons derived from it; the Middle-earth strings as data; themes as token sets; and a stylesheet for what none of that reaches. All four are on one page, in one settings group. The snapshot is a Jinja global over a process-level cache, because render() has no session and four render paths never reach it at all -- the sign-in page, the error pages, the offline page and the SSE fragments. A context value would have had to be threaded through every one and would still have missed those. It being a global is also what lets mark() branch on an uploaded logo without any of its six call sites learning about branding; the macro that renders the sidebar link is called brandlink now, because a macro imported as `brand` shadows the global for the whole template and took out every page at once. Defaults in code and overrides in the database, as the prompt fragments do, with one difference stated in the module: an empty fragment means off, an empty flavour string means the shipped wording. And blanked rather than dropped -- settings_store.update merges, so an omitted key leaves what was stored last time and "I typed the default back in" would store something different from "I changed nothing". A custom theme sets a handful of tokens and inherits the rest, and the inheritance is a CSS fact: tokens.css matches [data-base="shire"] as well as [data-theme="shire"], so a custom light theme lands on parchment rather than four light colours on near-black. Values are validated on read rather than on save, because a theme written straight into the settings table still has to produce a stylesheet that parses -- a `}` in a value ends the rule and silently breaks every rule after it. The soft variants are derived from the accent, or a changed accent leaves focus rings in the old hue and reads as half-working. /branding.css is a route, not an inline block: an external stylesheet has no HTML context to escape from. The link carries a content hash, so a save is not left to the browser's cache, and it is deliberately outside the service worker's precache list, which is versioned by the release. The instance name moved off /admin/general rather than being duplicated there. An upgrade keeps it: the general row is read as a seed exactly while the branding row has never mentioned the name, which is `key in row` and not `row[key] is truthy` -- the two read alike would resurrect the old name underneath a cleared one. The theme list stops being a hard-coded pair in five places. Every failure mode in that area is silent, so it is driven under a DOM stub as well as tested. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> |
||
|
|
e16bede85b |
Work handed to a second model, which may not ask
subagent_run gives a self-contained piece of work to a helper carrying the parent's connection, directory, model and effort, and hands its answer back as the tool result. The mechanism is the one scheduled runs already use -- a hidden chat, one turn, wake_chat, and a poll -- so tools, rounds, budgets, metrics and steps all work with no second implementation. The two alternatives were rejected where they had already been rejected once: a nested Generation is two replies writing one transcript, and a one-shot complete() has no tools, which schedule/runner.py records as useless for exactly this case. Every restriction is a property of the child's row, applied by resolve_tools after the gates, because a rule that lives in a system message is one a page the model just read can argue with. No questions, no recursion, nothing that writes unless the call asked for it and the parent's own mode would not have stopped first, and commands only from a fixed read-only list -- in every mode including Auto, because the task text can have come from a page. Withdrawing ask_user turned out to be half of "nobody is watching". An approval still built a card nobody could see and parked the reply until approval_timeout, which from every screen is the feature not working. Chat.unattended is the question now, and not the kind: _authorise answers with a refusal instead. A scheduled task's chat had the same hole and is covered by the same flag. Three bounds, counted where each is knowable: per reply on the parent's Generation, instance-wide in a set a restart clears, and per helper in settings of its own so one runs out of room long before the reply that asked. Past the clock the helper is stopped rather than abandoned, so a partial answer comes back with a sentence saying so. Also: four gates had shipped into the scope menu with no name, taking the first tool's label instead -- the canvas switch read "Canvas written". There is a test that refuses a family without one. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> |
||
|
|
6fcb9c9892 |
Defaults an administrator can actually set
There were none. `workflow.DEFAULTS` was the only source, so 512x512, euler and twenty steps were what every instance got whatever card it was running on -- and 512 square on an SDXL checkpoint is precisely what the tool's own description warns produces duplicated limbs. The two ways round it were both bad: bake literals into a template where the placeholders should be, or write prose in the instructions box and hope. Three rungs now, most specific winning, with DEFAULTS staying underneath as the floor so an instance that sets nothing behaves exactly as it did and a floor improved in code still reaches everybody. An empty box is "no opinion" rather than zero, which matters: read as a number it would set every instance to zero steps, and ComfyUI refuses that in a way that looks like a broken model. The right control for each, because a text box is wrong for most of them. The samplers and schedulers were already being discovered by the Test button, stored, and read by nothing at all -- they are the pickers now. A stored value missing from the list is kept as an option anyway, or opening this page and pressing Save would silently clear a working setting. Checkpoints are chosen rather than typed, and the instance default is a rung of its own instead of "whatever happens to be first in a textarea somebody filled in some order". And batch, at last: `batch_size` was a literal 1 in the base template, so an administrator whose card can comfortably make four had no way of saying so. Deliberately not something a model may set -- one asking for six because it is unsure is the exact cost this must not invite. The tool's schema restates the defaults it quotes. Every "Default 20." in there was written when there was one set of defaults in the world; left alone, an instance drawing at 1024 would go on telling the model 512, and the model reasons from that sentence rather than ignoring it. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> |
||
|
|
feca8861a1 |
Something a model could not do, and so wrote a note about instead
Asked to remind somebody every Monday, a model looked down its tool list, found notes_create described as "something worth having in a later conversation" and memory_add beginning with the word Remember, wrote a note, and reported that it had scheduled something. Every screen agreed with it. There was no scheduling tool at all -- the near-misses were the only thing there was to reach for, and nothing anywhere said the thing it was being asked for existed. The seam had been left open on purpose: Schedule.origin has defined ORIGIN_MODEL, with no writer, since scheduling shipped, and services/schedules.py says in its first line that it holds what the routes *and the tools* both need. This is the tool that was meant to go through it. Four of them, and a thin layer: rule.validate is still the one total normaliser the form and the compile share, schedules.create still writes the row and the task chat together, and rule.describe still says what came out. A second dialect for models would mean two definitions of "every other Tuesday" and one of them going quietly wrong. The result is that description, never "done". A schedule is invisible until it fires, which may be days away, so the sentence in the reply is the only moment anybody can check that Monday was read as Monday -- and the tool says so, in the text the model reads back. The list badges the ones nobody typed. Gated on schedule.use rather than a permission of its own: somebody who may set one up by hand may say so to a model instead, and a second checkbox beside the first would only ever be answered "the same as that one". Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> |
||
|
|
fa8c8ab5e8 |
An edge that is not drawn, and a panel that stopped eating the site
`hx-get=""` is not "fetch nothing". htmx looks for the attribute, not for a value, so the empty one the canvas rendered before a chat existed was a real request for the empty path -- which the browser resolves against the current document. Opening the canvas on the new-chat screen fetched the new-chat screen and swapped the whole site into the panel. The attribute is omitted now, and a test refuses an empty verb anywhere on the page. Which panels can exist is the server's answer; which are offered is the browser's. Both need an agent chat on a chosen connection, and before a chat exists those are controls in the composer -- so answering with the first profile offered a terminal on an ordinary chat with nothing selected. They follow `lembas:agent-target` now, and an open panel whose target goes away is closed rather than left showing one machine under another's name. `.tabs__body` is only sometimes the scroller: true where the tabs are a bounded flex child, false under the admin layout, where the page scrolls instead. So setting its scrollTop on every tab change had never once run on /admin/prompts, silently, while the reader was dragged to the bottom of a document that had just got shorter. The rule names the position now, and the handler finds the container that actually scrolls. The two top borders come off. They were what made the misalignment at the bottom of the shell visible; `--footer-height` stays, because two ends at different heights are visible without a line to prove it. The top of the shell keeps its line -- there, everything is `--header-height` and aligns by construction. And one version. pyproject carried its own copy and had drifted three minors from the one everything actually reads. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> |
||
|
|
60e7d0d599 |
Say what actually failed, and tell the model how to use the thing
Two problems, both found by looking rather than by guessing. ComfyUI writes its history entry in task_done and nowhere else, so the entry appearing IS "finished" -- but it sets completed=e.success, which means an out-of-memory, a cancelled job and a broken node all stay completed:false for ever. await_images waited on that flag. So every failure sat for the full 600s timeout and then reported a timeout, when ComfyUI had known within one second and written down the node, the exception type and the message. Proved by causing both against the real instance: an OOM now raises in 1.0s and an interrupt in 4.0s, each naming the node. The terminal condition is a record with a status, and status.messages is read for the last execution_error or execution_interrupted. OutOfMemory and Interrupted are their own classes because they are the two failures with an obvious next move: the first tells the model to retry at a named smaller size -- worked out from what it actually asked for, since "use a lower resolution" against a request that was already 512x512 is advice nobody can follow -- or with a lighter checkpoint; the second says somebody pressed stop, so do not simply start again. Everything else gets the reason and no advice, because a model told to try again after a broken workflow tries the identical thing. The OOM message is cut to its first sentence. The rest is allocator advice -- PYTORCH_CUDA_ALLOC_CONF, fragmentation notes -- addressed to whoever runs the box and meaningless to a model, in a tool result that is already a failure. Second: the parameters were described in the register of a reference table, and "cfg: prompt adherence, default 8" tells a model nothing it can act on. Measured on a 4B model, same request, same everything else: with the old wording it sent prompt and template and nothing more -- so 512x512 on an SDXL checkpoint, which is exactly the duplicated-limbs failure the width description now warns about. With descriptions that say what each value does to the picture and when to move it, the same model sent a portrait 1024x1536 and a deliberate sampler. ~3KB of schema per request in a chat that can draw, and the difference between having ten parameters and having one. docs/image-generation-instructions.md is the long version for the admin instructions box, for models that need more than the harness can afford to carry on every request in every chat. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> |