Filling the composer and waiting for Enter made the card a form to review
rather than a thing to press. One click, one reply.
That changes what a prompt has to be. The built-ins ended mid-sentence --
"My plan: " -- because nothing was sent until the person finished the
thought; sent cold they are a model guessing at material nobody gave it. All
three are rewritten to ask for what they need, so the first reply is the
right question instead. There is a test that they end as complete sentences,
since the failure is silent and only visible in the answer.
requestSubmit, not submit: it fires the submit event, which is what htmx
listens for. Same call the Enter key already makes.
Version bumped because app.js is what changed, and the service worker caches
it -- without the bump the first load after this would still only fill the
box.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
A blank composer is the least helpful thing a chat client can show someone
who has just installed one. Three cards now sit under the empty state, and
an administrator manages them at /admin/suggestions.
Clicking a card fills the composer and stops there. It deliberately does not
send: every default ends mid-sentence, because a card is a starting point
rather than a question somebody already asked, and the caret lands where the
person has to start typing.
Seeding is guarded by a settings flag, not by "is the table empty" --
otherwise an administrator who decided against them would get all three back
on every restart. Capped at twelve, six shown: past a dozen this is a menu,
and a menu on the empty screen is a worse blank page than a blank page.
The cards are gated on there being no chat at all, not on the thread being
empty. An empty chat someone opened on purpose already has a model and a
prompt chosen.
Also fixes a pre-existing bug the position test caught. Both this and
_refresh_models wrote `coalesce(max(position), -1) or -1`, and position 0 is
falsy -- so the second row landed back on 0 on top of the first. The
coalesce was already doing that job; the `or` was undoing it.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Jaroslav Beneš