e16bede85b36e05816ba092ff57c473a999dcf21
5 Commits
| Author | SHA1 | Message | Date | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
 Jaroslav Beneš
|
e16bede85b |
Work handed to a second model, which may not ask
subagent_run gives a self-contained piece of work to a helper carrying the parent's connection, directory, model and effort, and hands its answer back as the tool result. The mechanism is the one scheduled runs already use -- a hidden chat, one turn, wake_chat, and a poll -- so tools, rounds, budgets, metrics and steps all work with no second implementation. The two alternatives were rejected where they had already been rejected once: a nested Generation is two replies writing one transcript, and a one-shot complete() has no tools, which schedule/runner.py records as useless for exactly this case. Every restriction is a property of the child's row, applied by resolve_tools after the gates, because a rule that lives in a system message is one a page the model just read can argue with. No questions, no recursion, nothing that writes unless the call asked for it and the parent's own mode would not have stopped first, and commands only from a fixed read-only list -- in every mode including Auto, because the task text can have come from a page. Withdrawing ask_user turned out to be half of "nobody is watching". An approval still built a card nobody could see and parked the reply until approval_timeout, which from every screen is the feature not working. Chat.unattended is the question now, and not the kind: _authorise answers with a refusal instead. A scheduled task's chat had the same hole and is covered by the same flag. Three bounds, counted where each is knowable: per reply on the parent's Generation, instance-wide in a set a restart clears, and per helper in settings of its own so one runs out of room long before the reply that asked. Past the clock the helper is stopped rather than abandoned, so a partial answer comes back with a sentence saying so. Also: four gates had shipped into the scope menu with no name, taking the first tool's label instead -- the canvas switch read "Canvas written". There is a test that refuses a family without one. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> |
||
|
Jaroslav Beneš
|
6fcb9c9892 |
Defaults an administrator can actually set
There were none. `workflow.DEFAULTS` was the only source, so 512x512, euler and twenty steps were what every instance got whatever card it was running on -- and 512 square on an SDXL checkpoint is precisely what the tool's own description warns produces duplicated limbs. The two ways round it were both bad: bake literals into a template where the placeholders should be, or write prose in the instructions box and hope. Three rungs now, most specific winning, with DEFAULTS staying underneath as the floor so an instance that sets nothing behaves exactly as it did and a floor improved in code still reaches everybody. An empty box is "no opinion" rather than zero, which matters: read as a number it would set every instance to zero steps, and ComfyUI refuses that in a way that looks like a broken model. The right control for each, because a text box is wrong for most of them. The samplers and schedulers were already being discovered by the Test button, stored, and read by nothing at all -- they are the pickers now. A stored value missing from the list is kept as an option anyway, or opening this page and pressing Save would silently clear a working setting. Checkpoints are chosen rather than typed, and the instance default is a rung of its own instead of "whatever happens to be first in a textarea somebody filled in some order". And batch, at last: `batch_size` was a literal 1 in the base template, so an administrator whose card can comfortably make four had no way of saying so. Deliberately not something a model may set -- one asking for six because it is unsure is the exact cost this must not invite. The tool's schema restates the defaults it quotes. Every "Default 20." in there was written when there was one set of defaults in the world; left alone, an instance drawing at 1024 would go on telling the model 512, and the model reasons from that sentence rather than ignoring it. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> |
||
|
Jaroslav Beneš
|
feca8861a1 |
Something a model could not do, and so wrote a note about instead
Asked to remind somebody every Monday, a model looked down its tool list, found notes_create described as "something worth having in a later conversation" and memory_add beginning with the word Remember, wrote a note, and reported that it had scheduled something. Every screen agreed with it. There was no scheduling tool at all -- the near-misses were the only thing there was to reach for, and nothing anywhere said the thing it was being asked for existed. The seam had been left open on purpose: Schedule.origin has defined ORIGIN_MODEL, with no writer, since scheduling shipped, and services/schedules.py says in its first line that it holds what the routes *and the tools* both need. This is the tool that was meant to go through it. Four of them, and a thin layer: rule.validate is still the one total normaliser the form and the compile share, schedules.create still writes the row and the task chat together, and rule.describe still says what came out. A second dialect for models would mean two definitions of "every other Tuesday" and one of them going quietly wrong. The result is that description, never "done". A schedule is invisible until it fires, which may be days away, so the sentence in the reply is the only moment anybody can check that Monday was read as Monday -- and the tool says so, in the text the model reads back. The list badges the ones nobody typed. Gated on schedule.use rather than a permission of its own: somebody who may set one up by hand may say so to a model instead, and a second checkbox beside the first would only ever be answered "the same as that one". Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> |
||
|
Jaroslav Beneš
|
fa8c8ab5e8 |
An edge that is not drawn, and a panel that stopped eating the site
`hx-get=""` is not "fetch nothing". htmx looks for the attribute, not for a value, so the empty one the canvas rendered before a chat existed was a real request for the empty path -- which the browser resolves against the current document. Opening the canvas on the new-chat screen fetched the new-chat screen and swapped the whole site into the panel. The attribute is omitted now, and a test refuses an empty verb anywhere on the page. Which panels can exist is the server's answer; which are offered is the browser's. Both need an agent chat on a chosen connection, and before a chat exists those are controls in the composer -- so answering with the first profile offered a terminal on an ordinary chat with nothing selected. They follow `lembas:agent-target` now, and an open panel whose target goes away is closed rather than left showing one machine under another's name. `.tabs__body` is only sometimes the scroller: true where the tabs are a bounded flex child, false under the admin layout, where the page scrolls instead. So setting its scrollTop on every tab change had never once run on /admin/prompts, silently, while the reader was dragged to the bottom of a document that had just got shorter. The rule names the position now, and the handler finds the container that actually scrolls. The two top borders come off. They were what made the misalignment at the bottom of the shell visible; `--footer-height` stays, because two ends at different heights are visible without a line to prove it. The top of the shell keeps its line -- there, everything is `--header-height` and aligns by construction. And one version. pyproject carried its own copy and had drifted three minors from the one everything actually reads. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> |
||
|
Jaroslav Beneš
|
60e7d0d599 |
Say what actually failed, and tell the model how to use the thing
Two problems, both found by looking rather than by guessing. ComfyUI writes its history entry in task_done and nowhere else, so the entry appearing IS "finished" -- but it sets completed=e.success, which means an out-of-memory, a cancelled job and a broken node all stay completed:false for ever. await_images waited on that flag. So every failure sat for the full 600s timeout and then reported a timeout, when ComfyUI had known within one second and written down the node, the exception type and the message. Proved by causing both against the real instance: an OOM now raises in 1.0s and an interrupt in 4.0s, each naming the node. The terminal condition is a record with a status, and status.messages is read for the last execution_error or execution_interrupted. OutOfMemory and Interrupted are their own classes because they are the two failures with an obvious next move: the first tells the model to retry at a named smaller size -- worked out from what it actually asked for, since "use a lower resolution" against a request that was already 512x512 is advice nobody can follow -- or with a lighter checkpoint; the second says somebody pressed stop, so do not simply start again. Everything else gets the reason and no advice, because a model told to try again after a broken workflow tries the identical thing. The OOM message is cut to its first sentence. The rest is allocator advice -- PYTORCH_CUDA_ALLOC_CONF, fragmentation notes -- addressed to whoever runs the box and meaningless to a model, in a tool result that is already a failure. Second: the parameters were described in the register of a reference table, and "cfg: prompt adherence, default 8" tells a model nothing it can act on. Measured on a 4B model, same request, same everything else: with the old wording it sent prompt and template and nothing more -- so 512x512 on an SDXL checkpoint, which is exactly the duplicated-limbs failure the width description now warns about. With descriptions that say what each value does to the picture and when to move it, the same model sent a portrait 1024x1536 and a deliberate sampler. ~3KB of schema per request in a chat that can draw, and the difference between having ten parameters and having one. docs/image-generation-instructions.md is the long version for the admin instructions box, for models that need more than the harness can afford to carry on every request in every chat. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> |