fc02eb5538bcf7165defdff66e01fb5c00b6ca56
4 Commits
| Author | SHA1 | Message | Date | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
 Jaroslav Beneš
|
fc02eb5538 |
A directory the model knows about, and @ to name a file in it
An agent chat used to open with the model knowing the name of a machine and nothing about what was on it, so the first two rounds of every reply went on finding out. It now gets a listing: one read-only command, `git ls-files` where that works and `find` otherwise, falling back to an SFTP walk that always does. git first because a repository already carries somebody's considered list of what is not part of the project, and reproducing it by hand is how an index ends up mostly build output. The listing is budgeted rather than dumped. A tree of a thousand files is worse than no tree -- it costs the window on every request forever and buries the four names that mattered -- so directories that will not fit are shown as a count and the model is told to open one itself. Collapsing picks the deepest and largest first: by saving alone it would take `src/` before `src/web/static/vendor/`, because it contains it, and lose every name worth having. Read from a cache and never fetched. `harness.context_variables` is synchronous and sits on the request path; the walk happens in the generation setup, which is async and already doing network work, with a short wait. A chat whose first reply outruns its first walk simply has no listing that turn and the fragment disappears rather than appearing as an empty heading. Then `@`, over the same index and over the library, and `/` for commands with an Alt-based keyboard for the same jobs. A mentioned file arrives as contents, not a reference -- a small model asked to call file_read often does not bother -- and it arrives with its absolute path and the machine it came from, because a model handed `main.py` cannot tell which of four it is and cannot name it back when asked to change something. The rule that matters for `/`: a message that merely starts with a slash still sends. `//` escapes and an unrecognised command is posted as written. Swallowing somebody's message is a much worse failure than an unknown command. Two exceptions to Manual mode now, not one. Browsing and indexing are a person acting, not a model, so neither passes through policy.py -- the same argument the terminal panel rests on. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> |
||
|
Jaroslav Beneš
|
248dec2961 |
Temporary chats
A clock in the top-right starts one. It is never listed in the sidebar and is swept a day after the last thing said in it. A real row rather than something held in the browser, because a reload, a crash or a background tab all look identical from here -- "delete when you navigate away" would lose conversations people meant to keep. The flag rides in the URL (/chat?temporary=1) rather than in JavaScript, so it survives a reload and can be bookmarked, and the composer carries it as a hidden field beside model_id. Keep clears the flag. Without a way out, a conversation that turns out to matter is destroyed a day later with no recourse, and people would find that out exactly once. archived was filtered in three places and temporary mirrors all three, plus Folder.visible_chats. It also skips the unread flag in _persist: there is no sidebar row for the dot to land on, and the toast would name a chat nobody can navigate to. The sweep measures age from the newest message, not from the chat row. created_at would destroy a conversation still in use at hour 23, and updated_at does not move when a message is inserted -- onupdate fires on an UPDATE of the chat, and adding a message is not one. It runs at startup beside the existing upload sweep. Deleting a chat cascades its rows but leaves the files on disk; only the orphan sweep unlinks anything, and it looks only at uploads that were never attached. files.remove_files_for_chats() closes that for the new sweep. The same hole in delete_chat is pre-existing and left for its own change, which can now call the same helper. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> |
||
|
Jaroslav Beneš
|
1eba860d39 |
Knowledge, notes, memory and skills, and a harness to make them used
Four places a model can reach for, differing in who writes a record and how it gets in front of the model. **Knowledge** is uploaded by a person and searched by the model. It goes through `services/files.py:prepare` — the same pipeline as a chat attachment — so the same PDF produces the same text whichever way it arrived, and `Document` carries the same content columns as `Attachment` for the same reason. **Notes** are written by the model and edited by you. Too long to inject, so they are searched. **Memory** is short facts, and every one of them goes into every request. That single decision is where the rest of its design comes from: records are capped short, the block has a budget, there is no search tool because the model is already looking at them, and they are not shareable — a record about a person is not content to hand round. **Skills** are saved procedures. Only the name and description are injected; the body is fetched when the model decides one applies, which is what makes a hundred skills affordable. A model may write and revise its own — the safety story is not a gate but a record: every revision is kept, attributed and revertible. A model that has just read a hostile page can save a skill that outlives the conversation, and the honest mitigation is that it is visible and undoable rather than that it was prevented. **The harness** is why any of it gets used. A model handed a tools array ignores it and answers from recall, because nothing in the request suggests otherwise. `services/harness.py` assembles a preamble from what this chat actually has: when to reach for each tool, the memories, the skill index. This is an exception to "system prompts are precedence, not concatenation", and a deliberate one. That rule governs the three *authored* layers and is untouched — exactly one still wins. The harness is a different axis: it describes the machinery rather than the behaviour, nobody authored it, and there is nothing for it to disagree with. It is prepended to whichever authored prompt won, in one system message, since several endpoints reject a second. Supporting changes: - **Sharing**, in one helper. `visible_to()` is the only definition of who can see a library item and every listing and tool goes through it. Sharing grants *reading*; two people editing one note with no history and no merge is worse than copying it. **Administrators do not bypass this** — they bypass permissions elsewhere because an admin can grant themselves those anyway, but reading somebody's private notes is a different act. - **FTS5**, created by `db/migrations.py:ensure_fts` with the triggers an external-content index needs. Idempotent, like the column sync beside it. Terms are ANDed and then ORed: the caller is usually a model writing a whole question, and requiring every word loses the match on one absent term. - **The attach button is a menu** — file, image, a web page, or a document from the library. Attaching a document copies it, because history must not change when a document is edited later. - **A URL fetcher with an SSRF guard.** This server can reach the router, the other services on the box and LLeMbas itself, and the address can come from a model. Private ranges are refused *after resolution* and redirects are followed by hand so every hop is checked. An admin can open it deliberately. - **Model capabilities split** into protocol support and a toggle per built-in tool. Rows predating the split have no `tool_*` keys, and absent counts as on when `tools` is on — otherwise an upgrade silently takes web search away from every model already configured for it. Also fixes the test fixture, which built the schema with `create_all` and so ran against a database without the FTS tables production has; it now runs `sync_schema`, the same path startup takes. 430 tests, ruff clean. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> |
||
|
Jaroslav Beneš
|
d90195015c |
File attachments: images for vision, PDFs and text into the prompt
Drag, paste or pick a file in the composer. Images go to vision models as multimodal content parts; PDFs and text files have their content extracted and placed in the prompt. Verified end to end against gemma4-e4b-q8 on llama-swap: given a drawing and a text file, it named the red square and blue circle and read the number out of the document. Type is decided by inspecting the bytes, never the filename or the browser's Content-Type -- a .png full of text is stored as text. Images are downscaled to 1400px and re-encoded: a phone photo is several megabytes of base64, which is slow and a large slice of the context window. PDF text is extracted once, at upload, and stored; re-extracting per request would let a reply change because a parser was upgraded. Design points worth keeping: - Images are only sent to models an administrator has marked `vision`. This is not graceful degradation -- most endpoints reject the entire request rather than ignoring an image part. A plain text turn stays a plain string for the same reason: the list form 400s on endpoints that do not implement it. - Images reach the model as base64 data URIs, not links. A local endpoint has no route back to LLeMbas, and a hosted one has no credentials for it. - Non-images are served Content-Disposition: attachment with nosniff, so an uploaded .html can never execute in this origin. Stored names are random; the uploader's name is a label and never a path. - Uploads are unbound until the message is sent, which is what lets a file be removed beforehand. claim() only takes unclaimed rows owned by the sender, so a forged id cannot pull in someone else's file. Abandoned uploads are swept at startup. - A scanned PDF says so rather than silently contributing nothing, and truncation is declared to the model in the document tag so it can admit it did not see page 400. - "Here, look at this" with no words is a legitimate turn, so a message is only empty when it carries neither text nor files. Also fixes auto-titling, which read message["content"] as a string and would have broken on the first multimodal turn. 186 tests, ruff clean. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> |