`plan_submit` records an ordered set of steps and ends the turn. Offered in
Plan mode and nowhere else: it stops the reply, and a model in Auto mode
proposing a plan instead of doing the work would be obeying the wrong
instinct at the worst moment.
The plan is stored on the message rather than parsed back out of the prose,
so the button sends exactly what was proposed. It gets one more request to
say what it proposed and why -- a bubble containing only a card reads as
though the model had nothing to add -- but with the tools withdrawn, so
"one more round" cannot become three rounds of it changing its mind about a
plan somebody is being asked to approve.
Carrying it out switches to Edit, never Auto. The plan was written under a
mode where every command stopped for approval, and a button that also
removed the asking is not the button anybody pressed. It goes back quoted
and attributed, not stated: a plan whose text came out of a file the model
read must not arrive in the most trusted role in the transcript wearing the
reader's authority.
Also closes the rewind gap. Editing or regenerating a turn rewinds the
transcript and not the machine, so `rewound_at` is stamped and the harness
says so. Nothing tries to undo anything out there -- the project directory
is somebody's real working tree, and deleting their work to match a rewound
transcript would be far worse than the inconsistency.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
The four tools an agent chat has -- shell_run, file_read, file_write,
file_list -- and the mode table wired into the loop that decides which of
them stop for approval. Verified end to end against a real Kali container
over SSH: the card shows the command, allowing it runs it there, and the
file it writes is visible from outside.
The mode is enforced in `_authorise`, in the generation loop, server-side,
keyed on each tool's declared risk. Not in the prompt: a model is told
which mode it is in so it behaves sensibly, but everything it reads -- a
web page, a README, the output of the last command -- is untrusted, and a
rule written only into a system message is one a poisoned file can argue
with. Within an agent chat every call goes through the table, including
the built-in ones, because notes_edit writes and Plan mode meaning "look
but do not touch" has to mean that too.
Two things this turned up.
The runners re-check the mode as a backstop, and that backstop refused the
very thing a person had just approved -- the mode says "ask", and asking
was exactly what happened. Approval is now threaded per call, on a copy of
the context, because a round runs its calls together and only some of them
were allowed.
And the harness said nothing at all, because `registry` maps an offered
tool *name* back to a family and did not know the agent tools existed. So
shell_run resolved to no family and the fragment naming the machine, the
directory and the mode was never admitted. The same omission cost custom
tools their guidance once already; there is a test for it now.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Jaroslav Beneš