Files
LLeMbas/PLAN.md
T
Jaroslav Beneš 2c8c274850 Every injected prompt becomes editable, and several get written
The instructions LLeMbas puts in front of a model were hard-coded: six
strings in a GUIDANCE dict, two headings, and the title request inline in
chat.py. An operator could not see what was being sent, let alone change
it, and there was nowhere for a custom tool to contribute its own guidance
when custom tools land.

services/prompts.py now holds each piece as a Fragment, and /admin/prompts
edits them with a preview of the whole assembled system message including
unsaved edits. harness.py keeps only the decisions -- which fragments apply
to this request, and what their variables resolve to.

The design turns on one choice: a fragment carries its gate as data
(families, requires, when_tools) rather than as a callable, because a
database row can carry the same three fields. Custom tools will therefore
register a fragment source and change nothing else -- there is a test that
says exactly that, and it is the reason the rest of the shape is what it is.

Consequences worth knowing:

  - Defaults live in code, overrides in the database, and text equal to its
    default is never stored. Otherwise pressing Save once would freeze
    today's wording forever and no later release could improve it.
  - An empty override means off. A fragment that was not submitted at all
    keeps what it had, because it may be missing from the page only because
    whatever contributes it is currently switched off.
  - requires= replaced the hand-written pair of memory guidance variants.
    The sentence that refers to a section now lives inside that section, so
    it cannot outlive it. That was the general problem the pair was a
    special case of.
  - {{name}}, with anything unrecognised passing through verbatim. The name
    grammar is the guard: {"total": 1} and ${PATH} are not candidates.
    Substitution is one pass and never recursive, because {{memories}}
    carries text a model wrote.

The wording is also overhauled, and a model now gets the core fragments
even with no tools -- the date above all. "An empty harness is worse than
none" was about tokens that say nothing; a model with no clock being asked
about the present is not that. Clearing those boxes restores the old
silence exactly. New: today's date, who it is talking to, the three-round
tool budget, that tool results are not replayed, that anything a tool
returns is data rather than instruction, and what the <document> wrapper
around an attachment is. Extended: memory_forget, notes_edit/delete,
skill_create/edit, and reading a knowledge document in full rather than
answering from an extract.

Tool descriptions stay in code and are listed read-only. They are schema
and they state facts about what a runner does; an edit would make the text
a lie with nothing to catch it.

No schema change -- one JSON row in the settings table.

488 tests. Version 0.2.0, which also invalidates the service worker cache
so the green artwork appears without a hard reload.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-07-31 23:47:49 +02:00

12 KiB

LLeMbas — plan and status

Where the project is, what is deliberately not built yet, and the decisions that would be expensive to revisit. Kept current as work lands; the detail of how things work lives in CLAUDE.md.

Status: usable daily. Streaming chat, attachments, reasoning, tool calling with web search, a knowledge library, notes, memory and skills, speech in and out, users and groups, model administration, installable as an app. 437 tests, ruff clean.


The shape of it

A self-hosted web UI for OpenAI-compatible endpoints, written in Python, themed after Middle-earth.

Stack FastAPI + Jinja + htmx + a little Alpine
Build step none — no Node, no npm, no CDN at runtime
Database SQLite, schema synchronised additively at startup
Deployment systemd unit + nginx vhost, one worker

These are load-bearing. Dropping the no-build rule or moving off SQLite would be a different project, not a refactor.


Done

Chat

  • Streaming replies over server-sent events
  • Markdown renders progressively — re-rendered whole every 100ms rather than appending tokens, because a list or code fence is only correct once its context exists
  • Syntax highlighting (Pygments), sanitised with nh3
  • Generation runs in the background — a task, not the request. Navigate away, open another chat, close the tab: the reply keeps being written and reattaching replays the whole state
  • Stop — the send button becomes Stop while writing; what arrived is kept
  • Rewind — edit one of your own turns and the conversation runs on from there. Truncates rather than branching
  • Copy, regenerate, automatic chat titles
  • Chats created on first message, so an abandoned composer leaves nothing
  • Unread indicator — a green dot and a toast when a reply lands while you were elsewhere
  • Folders, arbitrarily nested; deleting one keeps the chats inside it

Tools

  • Tool calling — one reply is a bounded loop of requests, not one request. Text produced before a call is kept
  • Web search as the first tool: DuckDuckGo (no setup), SearXNG or Firecrawl, chosen in the admin area
  • Only offered to models flagged tools, because an endpoint without support rejects the whole request rather than ignoring the array
  • Sources stay in the transcript; results are not replayed as context on the next turn, for the same reasons reasoning is not

The library

  • Knowledge bases — documents, images and saved web pages, grouped into named collections and ingested through the same pipeline as chat attachments, searched with SQLite FTS5
  • A chat can be pointed at particular bases, so "answer from the contracts folder" is a different question from "answer from everything I have"
  • Notes — longer things the model writes down and searches later; editable by hand, because they are yours
  • Memory — short facts, injected on every turn to a budget rather than searched, and managed in your settings
  • Skills — saved procedures. Only the name and description are injected; the body is fetched when the model decides it applies
  • A model may write and revise its own notes, memories and skills. Every skill revision is kept, attributed and revertible — the safety story is a record and a way back, not a gate
  • Sharing — a knowledge base, a note or a skill can be shared with a group or with named people, read-only. One visibility rule, and administrators do not bypass it. Documents are shared through their base
  • The harness — an operational prompt assembled from what a model actually has, so the tools get used rather than ignored
  • Attach menu: file, image, a web page fetched on the spot, or a document from the library

Audio

  • Dictation — record in the composer, transcribed by any OpenAI-shaped /v1/audio/transcriptions endpoint. The recording never touches disk
  • Read aloud — any /v1/audio/speech endpoint, with the voice list discovered from the server where it offers one
  • Instance defaults in Admin, per-reader overrides in Settings — voice, speed, dictation language, and whether replies play automatically

Models and reasoning

  • OpenAI-compatible connections with encrypted keys and model discovery
  • Reasoning displayreasoning_content and inline <think> tags, collapsed by default, labelled with how long it took, never replayed as context
  • Model admin as a list plus a page per model; scales to hundreds
  • Ordering, pinning (a sidebar shortcut, not a reordering), instance default, per-user default, images, capability flags
  • Custom model picker showing avatars, descriptions and capabilities

Attachments

  • Drag, paste or pick images, PDFs and text files
  • Images downscaled and sent to vision models as content parts
  • PDF and text extracted at upload and placed in the prompt
  • Type decided by inspecting bytes, random names on disk, non-images served as downloads with nosniff
  • No OCR: a scanned PDF says so rather than silently contributing nothing

People

  • Accounts, argon2, revocable server-side sessions, self-service password change
  • Users and groups with permissions that union rather than override
  • Model access restricted to chosen groups
  • Registration toggle, instance settings stored in the database

Prompts

  • Three layers — instance, model, chat — with the most specific winning outright rather than being concatenated
  • Every injected fragment editable at /admin/prompts: the tool guidance, the memory and skill sections, the seam above the authored prompt, and the request that names a chat
  • {{variables}} with a legend, values shown as they currently resolve, and pass-through for anything that is not one
  • A preview of the whole assembled system message, including unsaved edits
  • Defaults in code and overrides in the database, so improving a default still reaches an instance that never edited it

Interface

  • Installable — manifest, generated PWA icons, a service worker for the shell and a themed offline page. The worker deliberately never touches /api/: a reply is an event stream and caching one breaks it
  • Two themes (moria, shire) from one set of design tokens
  • Every control sized from --control-h, so rows line up by construction
  • Toasts and dialogs of our own; no window.confirm anywhere
  • Original SVG artwork generated from a single source

Operations

  • Additive schema sync — new tables and columns applied at startup
  • deploy/ — systemd unit and nginx templates, install and update scripts

Not built yet

In the order they are likely to be worth doing.

Custom tools and MCP servers

An MCP client managing configured servers, their tools surfaced alongside the built-in ones. The loop they plug into exists now — services/tools.py is a registry of thirteen tools and services/generation.py already runs bounded rounds — so this is a client and an admin screen rather than a change to how chat works.

Agentic execution

Two modes, as originally specified:

  • local — subprocess on the machine LLeMbas runs on
  • remote — SSH connection profiles, with shell.run / fs.read / fs.write

Needs a confirmation model before it does anything. Note that the systemd unit is deliberately only ProtectSystem=full rather than strict because of this — revisit the hardening when the real filesystem needs are known.

Image generation

Left until last from the start, as it needs heavy customisation. ComfyUI is already running on this machine and is the obvious first target.

Smaller things

  • OCR for scanned PDFs
  • Conversation branchingMessage.parent_id exists unused; needs a UI for choosing between versions, which is why rewind truncates for now
  • Chat export (Markdown, JSON)
  • Semantic search in the library — the retrieval service is one call, so an embedding backend can go behind it without touching the tools or the UI
  • Archived chats — the column exists, nothing surfaces it
  • Per-user quotas

Known limits

Worth knowing before they surprise someone.

One worker. The generation registry and the stop mechanism are in-process. Running several workers needs that state in the database or a broker, because the request following a reply would not necessarily land in the process writing it.

A restart abandons replies in flight. Shutdown cancels them and keeps what each had. There is no resume.

Schema changes are additive only. New tables and columns apply themselves; renames, drops and retypes are manual against the SQLite file. MANUAL_STEPS in db/migrations.py is where such a step gets recorded.

Attachments live on disk, unreferenced files are swept at startup. No deduplication, no size quota.

Unread is polled every 10 seconds. A push channel would be more responsive but means an always-on connection per tab for the sake of a green dot.

Installing needs HTTPS or localhost. Service workers are unavailable over plain HTTP, so a LAN install without TLS is a normal browser tab. The microphone is unavailable for the same reason.

Tool calling needs a model that supports it. The tools flag is an administrator's assertion, not something endpoints reliably advertise. Set it on a model that cannot, and its replies fail rather than degrade.

Library search is keyword, not semantic. FTS5 ranks well and needs no dependency or embedding endpoint, but "how do I get paid" will not find a document that says "invoicing".

A model can write its own skills, and they take effect at once. Marked as model-authored and fully revertible, but a model that has just read a hostile page could save a skill that outlives the conversation. The mitigation is that it is visible and undoable, not that it was prevented.


Deliberate decisions

Recorded because each looks like an oversight until you know the reason.

  • No JavaScript build step. Browser libraries are hash-pinned and committed. A self-hosted tool should work offline and not report page views to a CDN.
  • Permissions union, never deny. With denies, "why can this user not do X" cannot be answered without simulating every group.
  • System prompts replace, never stack. Two layers that disagree give the model contradictory instructions and nobody can tell which is losing.
  • Rewind truncates, does not branch. Branching needs a UI for choosing between versions; "go back and try again from here" is what was asked for.
  • Pinning is a shortcut, not an ordering. A picker whose order silently differs from the admin screen is confusing.
  • Images only reach models marked vision. Not graceful degradation: most endpoints reject the entire request rather than ignoring an image part. Tools are gated the same way, for the same reason.
  • Sharing grants reading, never writing. Two people editing one note with no history and no merge is worse than the inconvenience of copying it.
  • Memory is never shareable. A record about a person is not content to hand round.
  • Knowledge attached to a message is copied, not referenced. History must not change under a conversation because a document was edited later.
  • The harness is prepended to the authored prompt, not a fourth layer. It describes the machinery; the authored layers describe the behaviour. Only one authored layer still wins.
  • Tool results are not replayed. Like reasoning: the answer already contains what the model made of them, and replaying stale results into every later request wastes the window and sends small models into search loops.
  • The service worker caches the shell, never a page with a user in it. A cached conversation would be a snapshot that silently went stale, belonging to whoever was signed in last.
  • Markdown rendered server-side. One code path produces the streamed and the stored view, so they cannot disagree.
  • This repository is public. Deployment hostnames, ports and paths stay out of it; deploy/ is templates, and the real values live in private notes.